moncler jackets online uk nominations reviewed

Commentary on howard berkowitz review News:Posting rules for main cz boards: (1)The cz forums are Citizensonly(A"Citizen" is ACitizendium member).Noncitizens may use only the"Noncitizen comments"Board, but still must register before posting(It's easy! ).Noncitizen posts elsewhere will be summarily deleted. (2)All must use their own real names.To edit your displayed name, click on profile > account related settings. (3)Citizens must link to their cz user pages.To edit your signature, click on profile > forum profile information. The process should then consist of identifying which parts of these criteriAare pertinent and then sifting through them. Besides that, this review was activated by a clandestine request for review, not over some problematic editor activity(And the ec has ruled conduct to be outside their interest anyway).That is a dubious trigger to act upon.They are fixing things that ain broke. Every year in the united states hundreds, even thousands of highly qualified people with phds., experience in business and industry, charities, universities,Etc.Etc., are nominated by the President, or by his Cabinet members, or by Department heads to fill tremendously important, even vital, nonelective posts. This would include, of course, federal judgeships, the link CIA, the Pentagon, the Chief of Staff of the various armed services,Etc.Etc. These posts are generally filled by people who are 100% qualified to fill them. But they are frequently being nominated by people who do not actually have the same experience and expertise in those particular fields to which these people are being nominated.So we have a president who has never been in the military nominating a man to be a fourstar general. Do we say that only another fourstar general can make that nomination?In the same way, all of these hundreds, or even thousands of people, must have their moncler jackets online uk nominations reviewed and then ratified by vote of the united states senate.Remember advise and consent? So we have 100 senators of various backgrounds and capabilities(Most of them are lawyers)And, dare i say, levels of intelligence, deciding whether or not many, many people who are far more intelligent and qualified than any of the senators are fit to hold the offices for which they have been nominated. That, it seems to me, is the situation we have at citizendium.We would like to have, for instance, a toplevel editor in nuclear physics, for example.An applicant with the apparent qualifications comes along.Does the epa citizen who approves editorships have to have a phd in nuclear physics to vet his qualifications and approve his editorship? If you think so, then in my opinion cz might as well close up shop. We all trying to do the best we can and the jobs to which we were elected.If you don like the way we doing it, vote us out and someone else in.Three of the mc posts will be up for election next month and then four of the ec in december.I repeat:If you don like the rascals, throw out! Dan says earlier that john isn qualified to comment on editorships outside his subject.But then, in general, the ec may not be qualified either, by the same token.There might be, in a particular case, nobody else in cz qualified. Well, no.What i wrote was:Expertise in computers, engineering and/or physics does not imply qualifications to determine the suitability of someone to be a history editor. I think most Cheap Moncler Women Sale UK would agree that"Does not imply qualifications"Isn the same as"Isn qualified".But, let move past that. My comments to john expressed my puzzlement why someone who field is physics/engineering would have such a strong interest in the determination whether howard has sufficient qualifications to be a history editor.John has been moncler coats uk a member of citizendium since january.He has made significant contributions to articles in the area of physics, which is laudable.But, i worked with physicists for over 17 years at llnl and, except for a small minority who had an opinion on everything, most focused on their field of speciality.Not only would most not have an opinion on the qualifications of a history editor, most would not even be interested in the question.So, my comments were an attempt to clarify this challenge to my experience.